sábado, 30 de setembro de 2017

Destruição


“The undeniable truth is that neither slavery nor Jim Crow nor the harshest racism…
independentsentinel.com

Escravidão e corrupção


Escravidão, e não corrupção, define sociedade brasileira por Editor | 24/09/2017 11:48 | opinião | 0 Comentários da FSP RESUMO Autor argumenta que a visão do…
revistafinal.com

Liberdade econômica do Brasil no 137. lugar


Antiliberal como os demais países da América Latina, o Brasil está entre os…
otambosi.blogspot.com

Raymond Aron

Holocausto indio


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengal_famine_of_1943
" An estimated 2.1 million people died in the famine, the deaths occurring first from starvation and then from diseases, which included cholera, malaria, smallpox, dysentery, and kala-azar. Other factors, such as malnutrition, population displacement, unsanitary conditions, and lack of health care, further increased disease fatalities. Millions were impoverished as the crisis overwhelmed large segments of the economy and soc...
Continuar lendo

Don't forget to like, comment, subscribe and share!! Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/Political-Kats-1001763583224645/?fref=ts References: http://your...

Churchill monstro

"Speaking during the launch of his powerful new book 'Inglorious Empire', the politician and author Dr Shashi Tharoor takes aim at a man venerated in the West but whose callous disregard for the peoples his country ruled caused untold suffering"

Speaking during the launch of his powerful new book 'Inglorious Empire', the politician and author Dr Shashi Tharoor takes aim at a man venerated in the West...
youtube.com


Did Winston Churchill Kill 4 Million Indians? In 1943, a famine wiped out nearly 4 million people in Bengal. Recently, evidence emerged that many of those mi...
youtube.com

R.J. Rummel

Death by Government: Stalin Beat Hitler but Mao Surpassed Both

R.J. Rummel

  • Print this page
  •  
  • Email this page
  •  
  • Twitter
  •  
  • Facebook
  •  
  • Bookmark and Share
Powered by Google TradutorTradutor
Alternative historian R.J. Rummel is recognized for his calculation of deaths caused by governments -- for which he coined the term "democide." Rummel argues that in the last century totalitarian governments killed more people than warfare.
Many scholars and commentators have referenced my total of 174,000,000 for the democide (genocide and mass murder) of the last century. I'm now trying to get word out that I've had to make a major revision in my total due to two books. One is Wild Swans: Two Daughters of China by Jung Chang, and the other is Mao: the Unknown Story that she wrote with her husband, Jon Halliday. I'm now convinced that that Stalin exceeded Hitler in monstrous evil, and Mao beat out Stalin.
From the time I wrote my book on China's Bloody Century, I have held to these democide totals for Mao:
  • Civil War-Sino-Japanese War 1923-1949 = 3,466,000 murdered
  • Rule over China (PRC) 1949-1987 = 35,236,000 murdered
However, some other scholars and researchers had put the PRC total as from 60,000,000 to a high 70,000,000. Asked why my total is so low by comparison, I've responded that I did not include the China's Great Famine 1958-1961. From my study of what was written on this in English, I believed that:
  1. the famine was due to the Great Leap Forward when Mao tried to catch up with the West in producing iron and steel;
  2. the factorization of agriculture, forcing virtually all peasants to give up their land, livestock, tools, and homes to live in regimented communes;
  3. the exuberant over reporting of agricultural production by commune and district managers for fear of the consequences of not meeting their quotas;
  4. the consequent belief of high communist officials that excess food was being produced and could be exported without starving the peasants;
  5. but, reports from traveling high officials indicated that peasants might be starving in certain localities;
  6. an investigative team was sent out from Beijing, and reported back that there was mass starvation;
  7. and then the CCP stopped exporting food and began to imports what was needed to stop the famine.
Thus, I believed that Mao's policies were responsible for the famine, but he was mislead about it, and finally when he found out, he stopped it and changed his policies. Therefore, I argued, this was not a democide. Others, however, have so counted it, but I thought this was a sloppy application of the concepts of mass murder, genocide, or politicide (virtually no one used the concept of democide). They were right and I was wrong.
From the biography of Mao, which I trust (for those who might question it, look at the hundreds of interviews Chang and Halliday conducted with communist cadre and former high officials, and the extensive bibliography) I can now say that yes, Mao's policies caused the famine. He knew about it from the beginning. He didn't care! Literally. And he tried to take more food from the people to pay for his lust for international power, but was overruled by a meeting of 7,000 top Communist Party members.
So, the famine was intentional. What was its human cost? I had estimated that 27,000,000 Chinese starved to death or died from associated diseases. Others estimated the toll to be as high as 40,000,000. Chang and Halliday put it at 38,000,000, and given their sources, I will accept that.
Now, I have to change all the world democide totals that populate my websites, blogs, and publications. The total for the communist democide before and after Mao took over the mainland is thus 3,446,000 + 35,226,000 + 38,000,000 = 76,692,000, or to round off, 77,000,000 murdered. This is now in line with the 65 million toll estimated for China in the Black Book of Communism, and Chang and Halliday's estimate of "well over 70 million."
This exceeds the 61,911,000 murdered by the Soviet Union 1917-1987, with Hitler far behind at 20,946,000 wiped out 1933-1945.
For perspective on Mao's most bloody rule, all wars 1900-1987 cost in combat dead 34,021,000 -- including WWI and II, Vietnam, Korea, and the Mexican and Russian Revolutions. Mao alone murdered over twice as many as were killed in combat in all these wars.
Now, my overall totals for world democide 1900-1999 must also be changed. I have estimated it to be 174,000,000 murdered, of which communist regimes murdered about 148,000,000. Also, compare this to combat dead. Communists overall have murdered four times those killed in combat, while globally the democide toll was over six times that number.
Read more on the Dr. Rummel website (new window will open).
Mais

Mortos pelo comunismo

"The total for the communist democide before and after Mao took over the mainland is thus 3,446,000 + 35,226,000 + 38,000,000 = 76,692,000, or to round off, 77,000,000 murdered. This is now in line with the 65 million toll estimated for China in the Black Book of Communism, and Chang and Halliday's estimate of "well over 70 million."
"This exceeds the 61,911,000 murdered by the Soviet Union 1917-1987, with Hitler far behind at 20,946,000 wiped out 1933-1945.
"For perspective ...on Mao's most bloody rule, all wars 1900-1987 cost in combat dead 34,021,000 -- including WWI and II, Vietnam, Korea, and the Mexican and Russian Revolutions. Mao alone murdered over twice as many as were killed in combat in all these wars.
"Now, my overall totals for world democide 1900-1999 must also be changed. I have estimated it to be 174,000,000 murdered, of which communist regimes murdered about 148,000,000. Also, compare this to combat dead. Communists overall have murdered four times those killed in combat, while globally the democide toll was over six times that number."
Ver mais
Alternative historian R.J. Rummel is recognized for his calculation of deaths caused by governments -- for which he coined the term "democide." Rummel argues that in the last century totalitarian governments killed more people than warfare.
orthodoxytoday.org

sexta-feira, 29 de setembro de 2017

A tragédia da colectivização da agricultura

O dia em que Stalin "abraçou" a Ucrânia em nome da revolução socialista.
A new book details how the Soviet regime buried evidence and even stopped people from fleeing famine-stricken areas in 1932-33
economist.com

Tulipmania

.

A new movie sets its doomed entrepreneurs amidst 17th-century “tulipmania”—but historians of the phenomenon have their own bubble to burst
smithsonianmag.com
summarized in this recommended book: https://www.amazon.com/Famous-First-Bubbles.../dp/0262571536
The jargon of economics and finance contains…
amazon.com

Entenda blockchain

Still Don't Get Blockchain? Here's an Explanation For…
blockgeeks.com

Conferência Canadá




November 10-11 we will be hosting our 6th International Conference of Prices & Markets, and we want you there!
mises.ca

quinta-feira, 28 de setembro de 2017

Novo livro sobre Adam Smith

"Eric Schliesser's Adam Smith is the product of two decades' reflection by the author on the great Scottish Enlightenment. Unique among treatments of Adam Smith, Schliesser's book treats him as a systematic philosopher. Smith was a giant of the Scottish Enlightenment with polymath interests; Schliesser thus explores Smith's economics and ethics in light of his other commitments on the nature of knowledge, the theory of emotions, the theory of mind, his account of language, th...e nature of causation, and his views on methodology. He places Smith's ideas in the context of a host of other philosophers, especially Hume, Rousseau, and Newton; and he draws on the reception of Smith's ideas by Sophie de Grouchy, Mary Wollstonecraft, and other philosophers and economists to sketch the elements of, and the detailed connections within, Smith's system.
"Adam Smith traces the outlines of Smith's intellectual system and situates it in the context of his highly developed views on the norms that govern responsible speech. In particular, the book articulates Smith's concerns about the impact of his public policy recommendations, especially on the least powerful in society. In so doing, Schliesser offers new interpretations of Smith's views on the invisible hand, the Wealth of Nations, his treatment of virtue, the nature of freedom, the individual's relationship to society, his account of the passions, the moral roles of religion, and his treatment of the role of mathematics in economics.
"While the book does offer a single argument, it is organized in a modular fashion and includes a helpful index; readers with a more focused interest in Smith's achievements can skip to their section of interest."
Ver mais
Eric Schliesser's Adam Smith is the product of two decades' reflection by the author on the great Scottish Enlightenment. Unique among treatments of Adam Smith,…
amazon.com

Construção da realidade social

Atender escola sem aprender

Custos de saúde


What is unique about health care is not fee-for-service, but third-party payment. Only in health care is someone else picking up the tab for our spending.
thefederalist.com

Política

"Politics is unalloyed idiocy treated even by – indeed, especially by – the intelligentsia as if it is a solemn and serious undertaking. But it’s not. Politics is overwhelmingly the domain of megalomaniacal frauds, liars, and con artists."
-- Donald J. Boudreaux

Animal farm

 summary less than 9 minutes long. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kF0ipHQsmCA
Its original title was "Animal Farm: A Fairy Story." Welcome to WatchMojo.com and in…
youtube.com
Versão longa:

A successful farmyard revolution by the resident animals vs. the farmer goes horribly wrong as the victors create a new tyranny among themselves.
youtube.com

Migração europeia


Younger people are fleeing rural areas, migrating northward, and having fewer…
citylab.com

Cidades privadas

Establishing free private cities in the 21st century
FREEPRIVATECITIES.COM