"My problem with the formal
rankings being used to measure research is that they give zero weights to
large numbers of research activities that are central to new ideas developing.
That zero weighting leads researchers away from these unweighted
activities and toward weighted activities. It leads rational researchers
to focus on small journalpublishable ideas, and to deemphasize large ideas that
might be more interesting, and have a larger research payoff. It also
leads them to worry less about what their research is contributing to knowledge
or society, and more to whether it is publishable. The publication of the
paper becomes an end in itself. That has happened in the United States.
Essentially, my
conclusion of my most recent study of top U.S. graduate economic programs
(Colander 2006, 2007) is that these graduate programs have become
specialists at producing highly efficient journal-article writers, but far
less proficient at producing broad-based research economists and far less
proficient at teaching undergraduates."
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário