by Maria Popova
A mind-bending new understanding of our basic existential anchor.
“The fate of the world depends on the Selves of human beings,” pioneering educator Annemarie Roeper wrote in her
meditation on how poorly we understand the self. Indeed, while philosophers may argue that
the self is a toxic illusion and psychologists may insist that
it’s forever changing, we tend to float through life anchored by a firm conviction that the self is our sole constant companion. But when psychologist David DeSteno asks
“Can the present you trust the future you?” in his fantastic
exploration of the psychology of trust, the question leaves us — at least, leaves me — suddenly paralyzed with the realization that the future self is in many ways fundamentally different from the present self. Our emotions and beliefs and ideals are constantly evolving —
Anaïs Nin put it perfectly:
“I am a series of moods and sensations. I play a thousand roles… My real self is unknown.” — and even biologically, most cells in the our bodies are completely renewed every seven years. How, then, do we know how “we” are? How do we hold the “self” with any sense of firmness?
Mais
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário