Sees Rousseau as the father of Counter-Enlightenment thought. Arguing that the question of Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s relationship to the Enlightenment has been eclipsed and seriously distorted by his association with the French Revolution, Graeme Garrard presents the first book-length case that shows Rousseau as the pivotal figure in the emergence of Counter-Enlightenment thought. Viewed in the context in which he actually lived and wrote—from the middle of the eighteenth century to his death in 1778—it is apparent that Rousseau categorically rejected the Enlightenment “republic of letters” in favor of his own “republic of virtue.” The philosophes, placing faith in reason and natural human sociability and subjecting religion to systematic criticism and doubt, naively minimized the deep tensions and complexities of collective life and the power disintegrative forces posed to social order. Rousseau believed that the ever precarious social order could only be achieved artificially, by manufacturing “sentiments of sociability,” reshaping individuals to identify with common interests instead of their own selfish interests.
"A significant contribution to the study of the Counter-Enlightenment. Well-organized, cogent, and written with clarity, this book presents the thought of a major modern figure in a significantly new light, building a sustained case for seeing Rousseau as a fundamental Counter-Enlightenment thinker." — Darrin M. McMahon, author ofEnemies of the Enlightenment: The French Counter-Enlightenment and the Making of Modernity
Graeme Garrard is Lecturer in Political Philosophy and European Thought at Cardiff University.
|
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário